You may lose control of the syntax and end up with a sentence fragment if you string together a lot of words. Remember that the next isn’t sentence:
“whilst in Western Europe railroad building proceeded quickly into the century that is nineteenth plus in Russia there is less progress.”
Here you have got a long ingredient introductory clause followed closely by no topic with no verb, and therefore you’ve got a fragment. You might have noticed exceptions into the rule that is no-fragments. Skilful writers do often intentionally make use of a fragment to reach a particular impact. Keep the rule-breaking to your professionals.
Confusion of restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses.
Evaluate these two variations of this sentence that is same
1. “World War we, which raged from 1914-1918, killed millions of Europeans.” 2. “World War I that raged from 1914-1918 killed millions of Europeans.”
The sentence that is first a nonrestrictive general clause; the times are included very nearly as parenthetical information. But one thing appears amiss because of the 2nd phrase. It offers a restrictive general clause that limits the niche (World War We) to your World War I fought between 1914 and 1918, thus implying that there have been other wars called World War I, and that we must differentiate included in this. Both sentences are grammatically proper, however the composer of the 2nd phrase seems silly. Note carefully the difference between that (for usage in restrictive clauses, without any comma) and which (for usage in nonrestrictive clauses, with a comma).
Confusion about who’s doing just just just what.
Remember—history is all about what individuals do, and that means you need to be vigilant about agency. 继续阅读